A coalition of organizations led by SUDS, Novact and the Committee of Solidarity in opposition to the Arab Cause, with the help of SOMO and Al-Haq, filed a grievance this morning within the investigative courts of Madrid in opposition to the journey company. on-line Edreams Odigeo, which is accused of “allegedly promoting and facilitating tourist reservations in illegal Israeli settlements located in the occupied Palestinian territory and the occupied Syrian Golan, and profiting from this activity.” The firm maintains that since September 2, it not affords these lodging.
The grievance additionally consists of two different American multinationals, corresponding to Booking and Expedia, as alleged collaborators via a subsidiary of the primary within the Netherlands and one other subsidiary of the second primarily based in Dallas (United States). The lawsuit alleges that eDreams allegedly used Booking and Expedia’s lodge stock and fee infrastructure, “while managing the brand and customer relationships.”
The case was uncovered primarily based on investigations and proof collected between September 2024 and October 2025 by SOMO and the Guernica G37 Center. These two NGOs discovered not less than 43 lodging commercials on the Edreams web site (inns.edreams.com), which corresponded to properties within the occupied territories within the West Bank, together with East Jerusalem, and the Syrian Golan) and on which they made reservations to build up proof for the presentation of the grievance.
Once the commercials had been detected, the now plaintiffs ordered the journey company on-line to withdraw them, one thing he supposedly did beginning on September 2. That month, nonetheless, each organizations counted as much as 35 listings for lodging situated in settlements that might be booked via an online handle operated by Travelscape LLC (lodging.edreams.es) underneath the eDreams model. The following month they had been capable of full and pay for 4 reservations via that very same web page, at all times in line with their story. “The company has acknowledged that some ads appeared in its inventory, despite its established protocols, demonstrating that there is no reliable and robust system to prevent settlement-related ads from being published. Furthermore, some ads were only removed after the intervention of NGOs and local groups, suggesting that the removals have been more reactive than systematic,” says Zainah El-Haroun, spokesperson for Al-Haq.
Edreams rejects any participation within the advertising and marketing of those properties since September 2. “Our policy of not offering accommodation in Israeli settlements is firm and is strictly applied on all our current platforms. The URL cited (accommodation.edreams.es) corresponds to an old page that is owned by a third party and is hosted outside of our systems. Consequently, it is impossible for any client browsing our official platforms to access these accommodations through search or navigation. We are in contact with the parties involved to clarify the matter,” the journey company famous. on-line in a press release.
Asked about this matter, a Booking spokesperson confirms that that they had an alliance with Edreams, via which the journey company took a part of its lodging portfolio and bought it via its advertising and marketing channels. “Since September we no longer work with them and we no longer have any agreement with any other travel agency.” on-line”.
https://elpais.com/economia/2026-02-17/un-grupo-de-ong-se-querella-contra-edreams-por-alquilar-viviendas-en-territorios-ocupados-por-israel.html