President Donald Trump slammed the Supreme Court’s determination to strike down his sweeping tariffs, marking the top of considered one of his signature financial initiatives.
The 79-year-old Republican labeled the landmark ruling a “disgrace,” whereas a lot of lawmakers, significantly Democrats, lauded the choice as a victory for American customers and the separation of powers.
In the 6–3 opinion launched on Friday morning, the justices dominated that Trump’s levies weren’t approved beneath the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which allows the president to control commerce in “unusual and extraordinary” circumstances when a nationwide emergency is asserted.
Chief Justice John Roberts authored the ruling, and was joined by conservative Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett along with the excessive court docket’s three liberal justices.
“The president asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope,” Roberts wrote. “In light of the breadth, history, and constitutional context of that asserted authority, he must identify clear congressional authorization to exercise it.”
Previously, two decrease courts, together with the U.S. Court of International Trade, sided with the companies that sued the administration, saying the president had overstepped his authority when declaring a nationwide emergency.
Trump calls court docket’s ruling a ‘shame’: report
President Donald Trump has responded to the Supreme Court’s landmark determination to strike down his tariffs.
During a White House breakfast on Friday morning, he referred to as the choice a “disgrace,” in accordance with CNN, which reported that he “has a backup plan.”
Brendan Rascius20 February 2026 15:41
Rand Paul says ruling makes clear what ‘ought to have been apparent’
Sen. Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican who has regularly discovered himself at odds with the administration, mentioned the ruling “makes plain what should have been obvious.”
He wrote on X that the authority to impose tariffs is “very clearly a branch of the power to tax.”
Brendan Rascius20 February 2026 16:55
Mike Pence weighs in on court docket’s determination
Former Vice President Mike Pence weighed in on the Supreme Court’s high-profile tariff determination — calling it a win for Americans and the constitutional system.
“Today’s 6-3 ruling by the Supreme Court is a Victory for the American People and a Win for the Separation of Powers enshrined in the Constitution of the United States,” Pence wrote in a publish on X.
Brendan Rascius20 February 2026 16:45
Some monetary specialists say court docket’s ruling is unlikely to trigger main market motion
Some monetary specialists have mentioned that the court docket’s ruling may have minimal market affect, as buyers had anticipated the choice.
“The Supreme Court ruling on Trump’s tariffs will unlikely be a big game changer for markets,” Matthew Ryan, the pinnacle of market technique at Ebury, a worldwide monetary companies agency, mentioned in a press release.
“Not only was the decision broadly expected, but the president has already signalled that he will quickly pivot to other legal tools to achieve similar trade restrictions, and he has at his disposal multiple levers to pull in order to circumvent the verdict,” he added.
Brendan Rascius20 February 2026 16:30
Gorsuch struck a conversational tone with those that could also be in opposition to the ruling
Justice Neil Gorsuch struck a conversational tone with those that could also be in opposition to the ruling in his concurring opinion, telling them that in the end, this can be a good factor.
“For those who think it important for the Nation to impose more tariffs, I understand that today’s decision will be disappointing. All I can offer them is that most major decisions affecting the rights and responsibilities of the American people (including the duty to pay taxes and tariffs) are funneled through the legislative process for a reason,” Gorsuch wrote.
“But if history is any guide, the tables will turn and the day will come when those disappointed by today’s result will appreciate the legislative process for the bulwark of liberty it is,” the Trump-appointed justice added.
Gorsuch ruled with the majority against Trump but he did take issue with some aspects of the majority’s argument.
He called out his liberal colleagues for reading IEEPA narrowly but not doing the same for other cases that call into question the “main questions doctrine.” That is a legal interpretation of the Constitution in which Congress must very clearly authorize the executive branch to make a major political or economic decision, otherwise we must defer to Congress for authority.
Brendan Rascius20 February 2026 16:20
ANALYSIS: It can’t be overstated how significant a defeat for Trump this ruling is
It cannot be overstated how significant a defeat for Donald Trump this ruling is.
Since last April, he has bet — and bet big — on using an expansive and untested theory of presidential power to unilaterally impose taxes on American consumers while justifying them to voters by brazenly lying about the fact that those taxes are taxes rather than fees paid by foreign countries for the privilege of accessing American markets.
During that time, he has used that now-rejected authority as a kind of Swiss Army knife to bully adversaries and allies alike into making all sorts of concessions on trade and other matters while eschewing the normal give-and-take of international relations.
But this Supreme Court ruling has taken that all-purpose tool out of his hands, calling into question whether he’ll be able to keep up the same level of bluster and bullying that has characterized his foreign policy since returning to power.
Without the ability to impose tariffs by fiat, Trump’s signature style of negotiating may fall flat as his targets realize he can no longer make good on his threats.
Andrew Feinberg20 February 2026 16:19
Stocks rise after landmark Supreme Court decision
Stocks rose on Friday shortly after the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s sweeping tariffs in a 6-3 decision.
The S&P 500 inched up 0.6 percent, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 0.3 percent. Yields on benchmark U.S. treasures also ticked up.
Brendan Rascius20 February 2026 16:10
Republican senator decries court ruling as ‘outrageous’ and a victory for ‘globalists’
Sen. Bernie Moreno, an Ohio Republican, decried the court’s ruling as “outrageous” and called it a victory for “globalists.”
“These tariffs protected jobs, revived manufacturing, and forced cheaters like China to pay up,” the Trump-allied lawmaker wrote in a post on X. “Now globalists win, factories investments may reverse, and American workers lose again.”
“This betrayal must be reversed,” he added.
Brendan Rascius20 February 2026 16:01
Justices argued that IEEPA does not explicitly give president power to impose tariffs
A key part of the Supreme Court’s argument is that the language in IEEPA does not explicitly giving the president the power to impose tariffs.
The court argues that the words “regulate” and “importation” do not authorize Trump to slap tariffs on imports “from any nation, of any produce, at any fee, for any period of time.”
Brendan Rascius20 February 2026 15:57
Court’s ruling does not impact all of Trump’s tariffs
The court’s landmark ruling does not apply to all of the Republican president’s tariffs.
It leaves in place Trump’s sector-specific levies, including on steel, aluminum and copper.
The ruling instead upends the president’s “reciprocal” tariffs on dozens of nations as well as the a 25 percent rate he imposed on good from China, Mexico and Canada, NBC News reports.
Brendan Rascius20 February 2026 15:53
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-tariffs-supreme-court-live-updates-b2924486.html