The Contentious-Administrative Chamber of the Supreme Court has decided that the maternity complement for demographic contribution of pensions that was in pressure between January 1, 2016 and February 3, 2021 may be loved by each mother and father concurrently in the event that they meet the authorized necessities, additionally if they’re civil servants belonging to the passive class system. Previously, the excessive court docket had unified doctrine permitting this assortment on the identical time within the case of the remainder of the employees of the Social Security Regimes.
Thus, the Supreme Court has confirmed the simultaneous assortment additionally for retired civil servants from passive lessons. In three collectively deliberated sentences, the Chamber highlights that its determination coincides with that which the Social Chamber of the Supreme Court has been sustaining for Social Security associates.
The recognition of the excessive court docket, each for employees within the system and for civil servants – who contributed in passive lessons till 2011 – got here after the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) dominated on December 12, 2019 that the Spanish rule that included mentioned pension complement was discriminatory as a result of it was solely acknowledged for ladies with not less than two youngsters and excluded males in a comparable scenario. That ruling brought on the so-called demographic contribution complement to get replaced as of February 4, 2021 by the so-called gender hole complement.
The decision provides that the demographic contribution complement was legally configured as a person complement, for moms or ladies, whereas the gender hole complement was configured as a single complement. This implies that every son or daughter solely provides the fitting to recognition of an financial complement for each mother and father. For this cause, the legislation clarifies that presently solely one of many mother and father receives this complement.
The Supreme Court justifies the design of the brand new gender hole complement as “individual in nature”, not like the one in pressure till February 2021, whose assortment has decided that it might be twin and simultaneous. And, it additionally highlights that admitting the criterion of the incompatibility of the twin enjoyment of the complement would lead both to the notion of the complement solely by the mom, or, the place acceptable, by whoever obtained it first; or to the appliance of precedence or distribution standards, not legally established. This might even decide that the mom who already had the maternity complement acknowledged might be affected by receiving it, in entire or partly, from the opposite father or mother.
In the resolutions issued, the Supreme Court upholds the attraction of three males in opposition to the rulings of the Superior Court of Justice of Madrid that had dominated in favor of Social Security, and acknowledges the fitting of the plaintiffs to gather the pension complement.
https://elpais.com/economia/2026-03-09/el-supremo-fija-que-el-cobro-simultaneo-del-plus-de-maternidad-por-los-dos-progenitores-tambien-se-permite-a-los-funcionarios.html