If one thing stood out within the character of Aníbal Cristobo (Lanús, Argentina, 1971 – Barcelona, 2026), it was enthusiasm. A torrential, extreme enthusiasm that was unattainable to withstand. In 2012, when he began the Kriller71 publishing home, he grew to become possessed by it: his private scenario – he labored as a receptionist at evening and had simply develop into a father – actually didn’t appear essentially the most conducive to devoting himself to impartial poetry publishing within the midst of an financial disaster. But Aníbal wanted to share that enthusiasm of his, socialize it, see it exist. And boy did he do it. Anyone who lived via these first years of Kriller – 71 step by step fell from the favored title, though not from the official one – when it was Aníbal who despatched the books to readers or left them on deposit in just a few bookstores, will do not forget that feeling of a secret occasion that was, on the identical time, a conspiracy towards the poetry that was normally learn and written round right here.
That enthusiasm, regardless of every part, wouldn’t have gone very far if Aníbal had not additionally had nice generosity, along with a sure reward for detecting comparable sensibilities. If one evaluations the prologues, translations, notes or credit score pages of Kriller’s books, it will likely be straightforward to see that Aníbal at all times labored collectively: with companions, with pals, with spontaneous or long-term collaborators; with passionate subscribers and readers who, abruptly, grew to become authors or translators of the home; and even together with his daughter, Marina, who accompanied him to all of the gala’s and shows that had been obligatory.
In this fashion, the passion and criticism of the hierarchies had been allied with necessity, as a result of nearly nobody was paid at Kriller, beginning with Aníbal himself, who continued to chain roughly precarious jobs that had nothing to do with literature. Thus, from that fragility of solidarity, considerably newbie however at all times jovial, Kriller put collectively a catalog that discredits that of different significantly better financed (and infinitely extra conformist) publishers: Iosif Brodsky, Kenneth Koch, Mary Jo Bang, Mark Strand, Frank O’Hara, Angélica Freitas, Ted Hughes, Jean Daive, Arnaldo Antunes, Gertrude Stein, Charles Reznikoff, James Tate, Edoardo Sanguineti, Fernanda García Lao, Gonçalo M. Tavares…
There was, in any case, one other Hannibal, extra taciturn, darker, who maybe grew to become extra pronounced in recent times. Because precariousness—regardless of how a lot it’s typically embellished within the cultural sector—is terrifying when it extends over time and appears to develop into countless. Hannibal skilled no less than three forms of painful precariousness. Kriller’s was, maybe, essentially the most seen, but in addition the one during which he discovered essentially the most help: when in 2022 he determined to launch a crowdfunding to maintain the publishing home afloat, the response was so vehement and beneficiant that Aníbal regained a lot of his religion within the venture.
In different precarious conditions—work and housing—he needed to fend for himself. During these final months, whereas his anxiousness and melancholy worsened, his obsessions had been precisely these: what would he do if he was fired from a job that, however, pressured him out and made him sad; What would he do when his rental contract ran out in a metropolis, Barcelona, whose costs had been now not inside his attain. And linked to each, as a bitter corollary, what would occur if the publishing home needed to shut.
It is probably going that, in nowadays and weeks to return, tributes to Aníbal and Kriller71 will abound. Many will probably be easy and emotional, from the core of the individuals who cherished him, who appreciated him as an agitator or who loved his work. Without a doubt, some bookstores and festivals that supported it’s going to additionally take part. It is even potential that we’ll obtain some murmuring from the cultural establishments that, generally, ignored him. In any case, what nobody ought to overlook, past the gratitude we owe him, is a bitter reality, one which lays naked the simulacrum of the cultural system during which we function: Aníbal Cristobo, that nice editor, was killed by precariousness.
https://elpais.com/cultura/2026-03-19/muere-anibal-cristobo-a-los-54-anos-un-gran-editor-precario.html