José Luis Sastre, journalist: “When there is terrorism, democracy is saved by people we end up forgetting” | Culture | EUROtoday

“I undressed too much. I don’t want to be that man who is so restless and worried that comes out there,” says José Luis Sastre (Alberic, Valencia, 42 years previous) pointing to the web page of his final interview in EL PAÍS two years in the past on the event of his first guide, The Stolen Phrases. Reflect on the variety of hours you’re employed. “Knowing how to waste time will make me age better. Miguel always tells me that to learn to do nothing you have to sit down and say: sofa, radiator, piano, window, street. I haven’t gotten to that point, but I’m working on it,” he says whereas ordering a glass of water and taking a seat. Miguel is Miguel Maldonado, his companion on the Sastre y Maldonado podcast. “We didn’t know each other at all. If the podcast has had something special, it is that it has been the construction of a live friendship.” It is Monday and he has simply arrived from Valladolid, the place he has adopted the elections in Castilla y León along with his radio program Hoy por Hoy, directed by Ángels Barceló. He is a columnist for EL PAÍS. Prepare a brand new program on TVE, The Judgment. And he’s now publishing Plomo (Plaza&Janés), a novel a couple of police officer who takes on the escort of a councilor who’s threatened with dying. A narrative about two nameless heroes, one of many a whole lot who existed within the Basque Country underneath the phobia of ETA whose title was by no means identified besides when it was printed on an obituary. It will be, nonetheless, the story of any terrorism confronted by somebody who may have averted voluntarily placing himself within the goal. Plomo doesn’t happen in any particular period, nor does any recognizable title seem. If the assaults are recognizable, the ambiance is (very) recognizable.

Ask. Why do you write this guide?

Answer. Because there’s a path value exploring. I used to be shocked to study the story of the bodyguards who protected Judge Borsellino. When the mob kills Judge Falcone, Borsellino says, “Now it’s my turn. We have to go fast.” So shortly after Falcone’s funeral he tells these round him that he’s going to proceed working, conscious that he’s already useless. And the group of bodyguards that protected him approached him and stated: “We are going to be with you until the end,” understanding that not solely may they be killed, however that their dying was going to be nameless. Nobody was going to know them. In truth, they kill Borsellino and kill a few of his bodyguards.

P. Impress.

R. I do not know what I might do. It is an fascinating dilemma for the reader. What strikes these individuals who, to defend others, out of a way of responsibility, surrender—or put it above—one other responsibility, which is your responsibility as a dad or mum, your responsibility as an individual, your responsibility to outlive.

P. One chapter is crossed by a protracted dialogue between the primary bodyguard and his brother-in-law. “One does not save the world,” his brother-in-law tells him, who needs to dissuade him, who needs his sister and nephews to be glad and never stay in that hell. The escort feels that he’s being held chargeable for what occurs to him. Another success for the terrorists.

R. In that dialog it’s defined that he who continues is courageous, and he who offers up and takes a step again just isn’t a coward.

P. “If I don’t do it, someone else will.” It is a phrase that’s normally uttered to justify evil, however right here it’s used within the reverse sense. An thought of ​​group.

R. Sometimes the premises that outline us probably the most are these which might be defined within the easiest method. This man does what he has to do, what he thinks he has to do. I’ve learn the articles of Albert Camus. How within the worst moments, throughout and after World War II, he was ready to attract that lucidity from the only issues. That’s why that phrase on the finish, which is a phrase that I’ve all the time had for myself, that concept of ​​justice that’s so easy, so on a regular basis: in each period we’ve got to do what we’ve got to do.

P. It is heartbreaking how the protagonist, confronted with the hatred and ethical distress that surrounds him, the snitches, the graffiti, the threats, the emboldening, says: “I wouldn’t want to hate, but it is inevitable.”

R. You find yourself hating. They can flip you into somebody who hates, not simply somebody who’s afraid. And overcoming that may be very tough. Because it is not simply that they kill your father or that you just see how they kill him. The factor is that the threats, the feedback, the persecutions comply with. Overcoming this human drive to hate requires a situation and a braveness that I do not know if I might be able to. That’s why I used to be within the thought of ​​responsibility. Not simply the individuals within the entrance row. I’ve personified him within the councilman and his bodyguard as a result of literary he helped me, but additionally prosecutors, individuals who went to work in barracks, professors, lecturers: individuals who had the braveness to say and do what they believed wanted to be stated and completed. I used to be all in favour of that and the concept of ​​goodness: if it exists, whether it is nonetheless potential. It might sound naive, however I consider that it exists, and that it has existed. That all that hatred has ended up being imposed by a real thought of ​​goodness that explains why so many individuals sacrifice a lot with out gaining something.

P. To converse out is to level out.

R. This is widespread in lots of instances in historical past and absolutely additionally at this time in individuals who not solely undergo threats but additionally need to endure feedback from individuals who love them: “But why did you get involved in that?” And he has to clarify why he’s doing what he believes is his responsibility.

P. That query drives the novel.

R. You fall asleep considering, “Am I putting my kids at risk just by doing this?” There is a second within the novel wherein María asks the councilman: “Have you thought about leaving?”, and he solutions: “I have to justify why I do it so many times that I think I anticipate that question.” Why did you do it, if nobody was going to recollect you and also you additionally ran the danger of endangering your life and that of these round you. That’s heroic. And for generations we’ve got taken that heroism with no consideration: “It’s their job.” But are we conscious of what that work entailed?

P. Were we conscious of that worth?

R. I’m unsure. In the chronicles it was stated: “They have killed a councilor and his bodyguard,” and for many individuals it was virtually as in the event that they have been value much less, as if it was assumed that they have been going to die with them only for doing their job. I believe that sooner or later it’s a must to rethink, and if this novel helps a bit, it is going to have been value it.

P. A terrorist or somebody who justified and inspired terrorism dies, and there are tributes and in style recognitions. But when a police officer or a councilor who spent twenty years trying underneath the automobile dies…

R. We have gone in a short time with some forgetfulness. There is a second within the novel when a girl at a funeral says that when every little thing passes and a traditional life is achieved—which for thus a few years was an aspiration—we shall be “an annoying memory.” I do not know if it is annoying reminiscence or not, however I believe our responsibility is, on the proper time and in addition with the passage of time, to proceed calling issues by their title.

P. There are all the time just a few who don’t abandon their place. Those who bounce on the entrance line in wars: they know that they’re going to die, and in addition that there isn’t any platoon with out a entrance line.

R. When a rustic suffers from terrorism or conflicts like that, democracy is saved by individuals we find yourself forgetting. They are individuals who have allowed political, financial, union or social leaders to have adequate safety to do their work. And additionally, on a better stage, there are these small networks that we construct: friendships, hyperlinks. That fraternity—a really post-war idea, when one wonders what we’ve got been in a position to do as humanity—had an important influence on me once I examine it. Sometimes I’m embarrassed to say it as a result of it appears naive, however I consider that: the extra sophisticated the world turns into, the extra I draw on that concept of ​​group, of making networks, of serving to one another. We have recognized participation solely with institutional coverage, and never. Political dedication has additionally been exercised by many individuals who’ve sacrificed themselves and who’ve by no means appeared on any listing.

P. María’s son, the councilor, asks her how one can cease being afraid. She solutions that by spending it.

R. Confronting him repeatedly till he stops having that impact.

P. A really exhausting scene: that sixty-year-old girl who places her hand in her bag to search for a present and the bodyguard jumps on her, believing that he might assault her. He says he has turn into irascible and distrustful. The value to pay may be very excessive.

R. Those who haven’t paid with their lives have paid with a change of character. There is a psychological influence. Imagine the youngsters who grew up in that surroundings. In the novel there’s a bodyguard who doesn’t dare to say “I love you” to his kids, however hugs them tightly, as if saying “I don’t know if…”. And these kids develop up with an summary concern, with out understanding very properly the place the hazard is. It just isn’t concern of one thing particular: it’s dwelling watching your dad and mom look underneath the automobile, being afraid when turning the important thing within the ignition. Growing like this marks. Can you will have a traditional childhood?

P. And the temptation of violence returns to that guard, who loses his mood and dangers a sanction.

R. I perceive that response. You reside hell. And the one factor this girl has completed is be a councilor, attempting to offer a public service. But they publicly bloodbath her, insult her, threaten her. And the guard says: “It makes me angry that the only thing I can do is file a report.”

https://elpais.com/cultura/2026-03-19/jose-luis-sastre-periodista-cuando-hay-terrorismo-la-democracia-la-salva-gente-que-acabamos-olvidando.html