After days of silence, Elmen’s pal Fahri Yardım spoke publicly for the primary time about Collien Fernandes’ allegations. In a social media publish he takes a stand – and never solely receives encouragement.
Four days in the past, Collien Fernandes made critical allegations in opposition to her ex-husband Christian Ulmen public. This contains, amongst different issues, digital sexualized violence, deepfake applied sciences and abuse on the Internet. Ulmen himself has not but commented publicly on this; his legal professionals reject the reporting. The presumption of innocence nonetheless applies.
Many distinguished voices have already proven solidarity with Fernandes and appreciated her step to make private experiences public and thus draw consideration to a socially related downside.
Fahri Yardım, who was in entrance of the digital camera along with Fernandes and Ulmen for the collection “jerks” from 2017 to 2023, now defined why he was silent for thus lengthy. He was “just as shocked as many others” and wanted time to course of the scenario.
At the identical time, he admits that silence will not be impartial. It influences public notion and will contribute to these affected being given much less religion – a sample that has usually been noticed previously. Nevertheless, he initially could not behave in a different way.
In his article, Yardım additionally describes how disturbing it’s when critical allegations come from one’s personal private surroundings. At the identical time, he reveals understanding that his late response is itself seen as an angle – with actual penalties.
He expressed his “full solidarity” with Collien Fernandes. He appreciates how they cope with their experiences and sees this as a possibility to provoke social change.
The reactions to his publish differ within the feedback below his publish: While some acknowledge his phrases, others accuse him of not taking a transparent sufficient place. There is even hypothesis that the textual content was created with the assistance of synthetic intelligence.
It goes one thing like this: “How many meaningless buzzwords can you pack into a statement?” And additional: “Clear words would have been necessary, similar to Benjamin von Stuckrad-Barre and not sentences that clearly had at least one copywriter and management behind them.”
Other voices primarily criticize the impact of the textual content: “It sounds generic, cryptic and impersonal to me.” There can be criticism: “I can’t grasp what your actual posture is.” Some of the criticism is summarized in a pointed approach: “Sorry, but silence would have been better for me.”
Yardım responded to this criticism that very same night. He described his contribution as “top-heavy” and defined that this mirrored his overwhelm. Finally, he introduced that he would converse out once more as quickly as he was emotionally clearer once more.
jr
https://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article69c0956f8f5761671715beab/vorwuerfe-gegen-christian-ulmen-fahri-yardm-bricht-sein-schweigen-im-fall-collien-fernandes.html