How synthetic intelligence is getting used to be taught to speak with whales or how New Zealand is a rustic with 4,000 conservation teams stuffed with nature lovers devoted to exterminating animals are two of the surprising tales within the newest guide by American journalist Elizabeth Kolbert (New York, 64 years previous), which now arrives in Spanish in bookstores: Life on a little-known planet (Debate). The winner of the Pulitzer Prize in 2015, for The sixth extinctionproven on this number of his works within the journal The New Yorker the acute complexity and paradoxes of all the pieces that surrounds life on Earth. “You can kill animals and still love them,” defends the author by way of video name.
Ask. Why do you declare that we dwell in a unprecedented time?
Answer. I’m a reporter. In this case, I do not belief my intuition, I belief the work of many scientists who I imagine would corroborate this assertion. We dwell in a unprecedented time as a result of, in the event you look past the day by day headlines – that are already fairly extraordinary –, in the event you actually take a deep have a look at the way in which we’re altering the planet and have a look at the whole geological file of the Earth since life emerged a couple of billion years in the past, it’s tough to discover a second with a change on the scale and pace like what is occurring now.
P. Doesn’t it have an effect on you to have to provide a lot unhealthy information?
R. For this there’s an expression in English: being the fly within the ointment. You’re not precisely welcome at events or enjoyable occasions if you’re spreading a lot unhealthy information, however as journalists, our purpose is not to make folks really feel good. At least that is my opinion. I suppose I’m an old school journalist. I imagine our duty is to inform the reality. If folks do not prefer it, I’m sorry, however that is the world proper now.
P. Even so, he says he actually enjoys this job.
R. Yes, completely. One of the ironies I typically level out, and which could be very evident on this newest guide, is that within the technique of reporting on plenty of unhealthy information—though on this case a number of the tales are fairly optimistic—I’ve been capable of go to plenty of actually unbelievable locations.
P. Can synthetic intelligence permit us to speak with whales?
R. I feel it is attainable. I’ve been following the venture that tries to make use of AI and machine studying to decipher clicks [sonidos] that sperm whales do, which we’re fairly positive constitutes some type of communication. They are nonetheless working, the truth is I spoke to them not too long ago, and I feel it’s totally attainable that sooner or later we can have, if not a dictionary of whale language, at the very least a very good predictive means: after they make a sure set of clicks, we’ll know what they will do.
P. If you may talk with a whale, what would you ask it?
R. The very first thing I’d say to him can be “I’m sorry.” Sperm whales had been lengthy hunted for his or her spermaceti, a substance that fills their monumental heads and was used for a lot of issues, resembling lighting oil within the nineteenth century and later as lubricant within the twentieth century. They had been hunted for business functions till the Seventies, which is sort of scandalous. After telling him that first, I’d then ask him “what is life like underwater? They are mammals that returned to the ocean after having evolved on land millions of years ago and have very sophisticated social lives. I would be very interested in talking about that.
P. What has happened to the sixth human-caused extinction since you published your book in 2014?
R. We are seeing a serious decline in the number of insects. These were considered very resistant, as they reproduce very quickly and have many offspring, but it seems that even insects are being affected by the sixth extinction. So, unfortunately, the news is that it continues to make good progress, as you would expect when we continue to put so much pressure on the natural world.
P. Can someone who kills animals be a nature lover?
R. Sure, there are many hunters and fishermen, men and women, who deeply love nature. Our relationship with the natural world, since our ancestors, is that of omnivorous predators. We kill many animals to eat. It is part of something deep in the human psyche. And you can kill animals and love them. The problem is that now there are many more of us. What once had a small impact can now, multiplied by 8 billion people, have devastating effects.
P. The case of eradication of species from New Zealand that is told in the book is very striking.
R. New Zealand is the quintessential example of the effects of invasive species. It is one of the last large landmasses reached by humans, first the Maori and then the Europeans. Until then, there were no land mammals there, but there were unique birds that nested on the ground. So when humans arrived with rats and other animals, there was a huge wave of extinctions. I went when they were launching the project Predator Free New Zealand, which is still trying to get rid of some of the more harmful introduced animals, such as weasels.
P. It is striking that there are so many conservationists turned trappers.
R. Some invasive species don’t attract much sympathy, like rats, but others, like small opossums, are adorable but very harmful. Many people believe that the benefit to the native fauna justifies it, but it is a complex dilemma.
P. Can Trump’s avid interest in Greenland be explained without the existence of climate change?
R. Probably not. Explaining Trump is like trying to explain why a two-year-old wants something, but it has become much easier to navigate around Greenland because much of the sea ice has disappeared. Before, there were entire periods in winter when you couldn’t bring a ship near many parts of Greenland. Now you can arrive practically at any time. I don’t know what he wants. I’ve been there several times, and it’s a very difficult place to do business because it has very little infrastructure. There are basically no roads. There has been quite a bit of interest in mining in Greenland for some time now, including from Greenlanders themselves, but it is unclear whether it is economically viable.
P. He says one of the problems with acting on climate change is that warnings sometimes seem hysterical.
R. We have a hard time imagining really bad futures. You look out the window and it doesn’t seem like anything that terrible is happening. The food keeps coming, you keep watching TV and going to work. But what we are doing to the climate is irreversible and is taking us to a state our species has never experienced. Not Elizabeth Kolbert says it, but thousands and thousands of scientists. This can be very traumatic and disruptive, and when you say it it sounds alarmist, but it is simply a scientific fact.
P. What do you think of the US’s retreat in the fight against climate change?
R. It’s tragic.
P. Can climate disaster still be avoided?
R. Hardly.
P. Can climate change be communicated better to get more people to help stop it?
R. In theory, yes. But I still haven’t found how.
P. In his latest book he explains the Swiss initiative that defends that you can live well with an energy consumption of 2,000 watts, the equivalent of 20 100-watt light bulbs (six times less than what an American uses today). How many watts does Elizabeth Kolbert need to live?
R. I have never measured my own watts. I think I live a low-energy life, except for flights. There I totally make my mark. I couldn’t do my job without flying. I always wonder if the carbon I generate is justified. I guess that’s for the readers to judge.
P. What attracts you most about the much that is still unknown about the planet?
R. I’m not a diver, I’m not somebody who can dive deeply, however I’m fascinated by it and have learn many books concerning the deep ocean, that frontier that’s now additionally threatened by underwater mining. It’s not going to occur, however I’d like to see the underside of the ocean.
https://elpais.com/clima-y-medio-ambiente/2026-03-31/elizabeth-kolbert-periodista-es-posible-que-la-ia-nos-permita-comunicarnos-con-las-ballenas-y-lo-primero-que-les-diria-es-lo-siento.html