Britain should act now to rebuild navy and deter our foes | Politics | News | EUROtoday

Lord Dannatt, the previous head of the Army, needs Britain to keep away from repeating fateful errors which left the nation dangerously weakened within the years main as much as World War 2.

“I’m afraid that we are vulnerable right across the piece,” he warns. “The Army, Navy and the Air Force have effectively never been smaller in peacetime than they are now.”

He sees worrying parallels between the state of the armed forces right this moment and the best way the nation was ill-prepared to tackle Nazi Germany. In his 2023 guide with Robert Lyman, Victory to Defeat, he detailed how the British Army went from defeating the German navy in World War 1 to being compelled to evacuate at Dunkirk in 1940. He argues that after years of failing to put money into our defences Britain lastly realised “Hitler was a threat” and the “rearmament process began just in time”.

Warning that we’re in a “similar situation” right this moment, with Vladimir Putin threatening Europe’s safety, he asks: “How much time have we got left to be just in time? Are we drinking in the last chance saloon?”

The 75-year-old warns that failing to keep up a powerful navy may end up in colossal value, pointing to how Britain went from investing lower than 3% of GDP in defence earlier than the struggle with Germany to spending 46% in 1940 when the nation was “fighting for our very survival”. Today, he’s calling for Britain to “massively increase our investment in all types of drones for surveillance, for reconnaissance, for attack, and for defence”.

But he provides: “Just because there are new technologies, it doesn’t mean to say that the old technologies can be dispensed with. Main battle tanks and armoured infantry fighting vehicles and traditional gun and rocket artillery will still be needed in the future.”

The variety of common troopers has crashed 153,000 in 1990 to simply 73,790 in the beginning of the 12 months.

“Years ago we said the critical mass below which we must not fall was 100,000,” he notes, including: “I would argue that getting back towards that 100,000 figure is a sensible objective to move towards, supplemented by a much larger mobilisable reserve.”

Plans for a ballistic missile defence system have been shelved within the late Nineteen Nineties, he says, and now that is an “acknowledged weakness”. It could be “phenomenally expensive” to roll out a brand new system to guard Britain; tough decisions await about what areas must be prioritised for defence and there’s “urgent work” to be achieved.

Looking again to the times when the nation invested shut to five% of GDP in defence, he says: “We deterred further aggression from the Soviet Union, and the Cold War never went hot.”

Right now, the Government has a dedication to spend 2.5% of GDP on defence by April subsequent 12 months, alongside an ambition to take a position 3% within the subsequent parliament.

Getting again to “something approaching 5%”, he suggests, would be the “price we ought to be paying for our security”.

Where can the cash come from to spice up defence expenditure? Lord Dannatt, who was Chief of the General Staff from 2006 to 2009, lays out the onerous decisions.

“We might all have to share the burden of increased defence by paying a few pence more on the basic rate of income tax. But otherwise, it’s a question of reordering Government spending priorities. And one has to look at the burgeoning, out-of-control welfare budget.”

It is one factor to have “the best welfare system in the world”, he remarks, “but if it’s under Russian domination, it’s a waste of time.”

Lord Dannatt’s first tour of responsibility was in Northern Ireland in 1971. There is now immense concern all through the veterans neighborhood that those that served within the province through the years of IRA terror might face vexatious prosecutions. This has intensified on account of Labour’s choice to repeal the so-called Legacy Act, which was supposed to supply conditional immunity to those that served.

On his final day as head of the Army, Lord Dannatt was quizzed by two members of the Police Service of Northern Ireland about actions by his platoon in Belfast in 1973.

Describing the grilling as a “complete waste of time”, he says: “If even the Chief of the General Staff is going to be quizzed in an unnecessary fashion, one worries about a 75-year-old former private who may not be able to recall what happened, who may feel under huge pressure and be extraordinarily worried. And frankly, we’ve got to find a mechanism to stop all that.”

He agrees that if “substantive evidence” is uncovered then a case must be reopened, however he argues that Sinn Fein – which through the Troubles served because the political wing of the IRA and now leads the Stormont Government – is on a mission to rewrite historical past and paint UK forces because the “oppressor”.

The retired basic fears each Vladimir Putin and the US President have fallen sufferer to “hubris”, pondering “they can use the military arm to suddenly achieve something that hasn’t been properly thought through”.

Condemning an “oversight of ridiculous proportions”, he states it ought to have been clear that “the Iranians could put their foot on the neck of the West by controlling the Strait of Hormuz” and chopping off oil provides.

Looking East, Lord Dannatt warns of the hazard if a ceasefire is agreed in Ukraine which freezes the battle however doesn’t revolve it, pointing to the multi-decades stand-off between North and South Korea.

“If Ukraine stops with a ceasefire and there’s no peace agreement, just think about this,” he says. “The United States still has 25,000 soldiers in South Korea guaranteeing that ceasefire. When Keir Starmer said he’s ready and willing to put British boots on the ground to guarantee a ceasefire, is he willing to keep them there for 75 years?”

A ceasefire, he warns, would enable “Russian armed forces to reset, reconstitute themselves and either push again in Ukraine or perhaps push in the Baltics or Scandinavia or the High North or wherever”.

Despite the severity of the threats dealing with the nation, Lord Dannatt, a religious Christian, burns with hope for a greater future.

He describes how in August 1971, when stationed in Northern Ireland, “the violence was so deep-seated, the hatred was so deep-seated, one couldn’t see a way forward”.

But, he provides: “One hoped there might be better times. And that hope has been realised. And I was in Belfast a month ago and was able to go up and down the Crumlin road, up and down the Falls road, without fear at all. Better times have come.”

Warming to the theme, he provides: “My wife and I started married life in Berlin in 1977, when that city was divided, when Germany was divided. One hoped that better times might come for Berlin and for Germany and for Europe.

“And that hope was realised when the Berlin Wall came down and Germany was reunified and the Soviet Union collapsed.

“So in times of great difficulty, when you can’t see your way forward, I think it is legitimate to hope there might be better times and to work towards the hope of better times.”

Today, he holds onto hope for peace for the folks of Israel and Gaza, of the broader Middle East, and Taiwan.

“I don’t think it’s naive to believe in hope,” he says. “I think hope sustains, hope encourages, and hope can be a guiding light.”