Isabel Rodríguez: “We have won; those who defend the ball no longer dare to say it in public” | Housing | Economy | EUROtoday

In her two and a half years, greater than half a time period, on the head of the Ministry of Housing, Isabel Rodríguez (Abenójar, Ciudad Real, 44 years previous) says that her largest thorn within the aspect is the problem of translating into parliamentary agreements “what is part of the social, economic, academic consensus and solutions to the housing problem.” The minister locations emphasis all through the interview on phrases equivalent to “consensus”, “pact” or “agreement”, though she doesn’t shrink back from allusions to some autonomous communities with which her division has clashed. He spoke to EL PAÍS at some point after approving the State Housing Plan 2026-2030, which focuses on the safety of protected homes in perpetuity, and at some point earlier than visiting Andalusia within the midst of the electoral pre-campaign.

Ask. Why do home costs proceed to rise in Spain?

Answer. We are dealing with a really advanced disaster. All housing crises are. This, indubitably, may be very marked by a excessive demand for housing and by a complexity on the subject of facilitating and increasing the provision. And indubitably the brand new state plan will fight these circumstances. It is a really decided plan with two fundamental targets: that of guaranteeing a public housing inventory that combats the voracity of the free market and that of avoiding hypothesis round a fundamental good and a proper equivalent to housing.

R. But the results of the plan will take time to be seen. What message do you ship to those that have housing issues now?

R. We will not be performing solely on one entrance, which will surely not remedy the issue. Just as we’re engaged on structural measures that may change the framework of our nation, particularly within the formation of a public housing inventory, we’re performing with immediacy and urgency. For these people who find themselves involved about their present state of affairs, this authorities has promoted transcendental plans and modifications, such because the laws that come within the housing regulation to have the ability to freeze the value of hire all through Spain. The anomaly is that, confronted with an issue of this dimension, the leaders of the Popular Party, who may very well be freezing rents, are trying the opposite means when not delving into the issue, calling on buyers and vulture funds to proceed investing in the true property market.

P. You have said that not one public euro from the plan will feed housing that may be privatized. How is that assured?

R. The dedication of this Government is mirrored on this plan. Not a single euro of it may be invested, nor a single public land allotted, for any goal aside from the development of public housing perpetually. And moreover, present occasions have led us to need to protect with an anti-fraud clause one thing that we thought may now not happen: there are nonetheless public administrations that play with protected housing and that, with a corrupt system, guess on the distribution of this housing not among the many individuals who want it, however among the many normal ones.

P. Is the truth that the plan requires bilateral agreements with the communities ample safety in opposition to an eventual change within the Government?

R. The shielding of protected public housing perpetually is inexcusable. There is not any means out of that settlement.

P. But the Constitutional Court ensures that communities could make disqualifiable VPO with their very own assets. What do you say to those that defend that mannequin?

R. Look how curious that those that defend the ball now not dare to say it in public. We are beating them. There is a social consensus that hypothesis concerning housing can’t be allowed on this nation. That is, we now have already received. With this plan, in follow we’re going to forestall these disqualifications from occurring. Voters of the Popular Party additionally imagine that housing shouldn’t serve both hypothesis or ball-gagging.

P. Is the financing of the plan assured even when there aren’t any budgets?

R. On the identical day that we permitted it within the Council of Ministers, we now have permitted a spending authorization for the subsequent annuities till 2030. Therefore, the financing of this plan is assured. And I’ll let you know extra: the autonomous communities will be capable to absolutely deploy it within the second semester. Those that rapidly signal with the Ministry of Housing will be capable to spend these assets within the second half of this 12 months. There aren’t any excuses. If they want assets, they’ve them.

P. What does it imply to signal rapidly?

R. We have articulated the mechanism via which we can instantly switch credit score from the General State Administration to the autonomous communities in July.

P. In any case, it needs to be after a sectoral convention.

R. Yes, the sectoral convention will foreseeably be in May to forestall the electoral context [en Andalucía] forestall what is nice for Spaniards in all communities.

P. What occurs if a neighborhood refuses to take part within the plan?

R. It’s onerous for me to grasp that that is going to occur. It is a plan that triples the assets that we now have been making use of, which suggests going from simply 300 million euros in Madrid to greater than 1,100. If there may be any neighborhood that’s contemplating torpedoing, they should clarify it first.

P. He cites Madrid, which has described the plan as interventionist and has launched its personal initiative to construct protected housing.

R. That Madrid makes its personal plan appears good to me. It is a part of its political autonomy, its fiscal autonomy and its monetary autonomy. Now, I hope they enhance the Vive Plan [programa público de alquiler] of houses which can be falling aside, which can be stuffed with leaks or with costs which can be unaffordable for almost all. That’s not my mannequin. And with the excuse of interventionism, what we would like is to forestall what we now have already seen in Madrid from occurring once more: stopping everybody’s efforts from ending up within the arms of vulture funds can also be a part of the consensus of the individuals of Madrid, who’re nonetheless topic to eviction processes for these gross sales of [la exalcaldesa] Ana Botella at vulture funds.

P. What do you consider the Madrid City Council’s plan to densify new city developments? Is there a chance that it impacts Operation Camp?

R. The Camp undertaking is already very superior and right now there aren’t any modifications to phases 1 and a pair of. In future phases it is going to be crucial to guage whether or not densifying is appropriate with sustaining the standard of lifetime of the residents, which is one thing that every one administrations should remember after we make these approaches.

P. Three years have handed because the approval of the Housing Law. Depending on who you hearken to, it appears to work very nicely or fairly the alternative…

R. There is even the paradox that there are those that don’t apply the regulation and criticize that the results and issues it has of their territory are a consequence of the regulation. There are public programs which can be analyzing the results in Catalonia, in Navarra, within the Basque Country… They clearly inform us about indeniable worth containment. We have stopped the bleeding. Have rents stopped rising? Does it remedy the issue? Not in any respect, we now have to proceed taking steps. There we now have public information. What occurs with the registration of bail bonds within the Community of Madrid?

P. Does the brand new obligation for communities to share extra details about the market search to fight portal information?

R. When we discuss housing, sadly we’re nonetheless speaking in regards to the market. And that suggests that information administration might or might not profit totally different financial pursuits. I would like them to learn the residents, not the investor, not the portal, not the speculator.

P. Critics of the regulation converse of a discount in provide, with leaks in the direction of vacationer, seasonal and room leases.

R. And that evaluation is finished. Indeed, when the free market and the voracity of speculators are restricted, they attempt to search for holes. And it’s important to cowl all of them. Our ambition is to proceed regulating and perform necessary agreements, such because the presentation of the Seasonal Accommodation Law that’s within the Congress of Deputies and even on the agenda of the European Commission.

P. Is the Ministry contemplating a extra direct intervention in vacationer and seasonal leases?

R. We will not be going to cease till we handle to control this for the advantage of the residents. We are going to go so far as the parliamentary majorities permit us, and I would love the Congress of Deputies to take care of social consensus. That rental costs should be restricted and unlawful vacationer lodging should be prosecuted, even prohibiting them in cities, is a part of the consensus of 80% or 90% of Spanish society.

P. The registration of vacationer residences has been contested by some communities and is pending a judicial ruling. Do you belief that it’s going to proceed to be utilized?

R. It is being utilized and it has been very optimistic. The reality of getting illuminated an irregularity in 100,000 vacationer residences reveals that it has been a helpful instrument to intervene and enhance entry to housing. What is an anomaly is that the place it’s evident, as in Andalusia, that there was an illegality of as much as 20,000 irregular houses, as a substitute of pursuing this irregularity, what is finished is to go in opposition to the norm.

P. Why has your ministry remained within the background within the negotiation of the hire extension decree?

R. I believe the necessary factor right here is to maintain transferring ahead. Each of us is liable for our actions, and I’m liable for these of the Government as a complete. Afterwards, political and parliamentary teams additionally need to play their position, their position.

P. Is the socialist group negotiating for the validation of the decree with the assist of your ministry?

R. Always, all of the decrees. We do not need to lose even one. And much more so this one that’s already in drive.

P. But you, a priori, didn’t appear very satisfied with the extension and even expressed authorized doubts.

R. It was lengthy earlier than this circumstance [de la guerra de Irán] and it needed to do with the doctrine that has been adopted concerning when extraordinary choices are adopted. The context through which this response is given should be vastly adjusted and that’s what has been performed with this decree.

P. If the decree falls as anticipated, will tenants be left unprotected?

R. I hope it would not occur. I hope that, even when it occurs, the courts will take a stand on the aspect of the correct to housing and the social operate of housing. And, in any case, I imagine that the magnitude of the issue requires that we not quit. I’m not going to decrease them as minister.

If you’ve questions, strategies or just need to inform us about your case, you may ship us an e mail at vivienda@elpais.es.


The information you present can be processed by EDICIONES EL PAÍS, SLU, (C/ Miguel Yuste, 40, 28037-Madrid), so as to handle your doubts and/or testimonials and develop informative content material. You might train your acknowledged rights concerning information safety via the handle dpo@prisa.com proving your identification and figuring out the correct you want to train. For extra data seek the advice of the Privacy Policy.

https://elpais.com/economia/vivienda/2026-04-26/isabel-rodriguez-hemos-ganado-quienes-defienden-el-pelotazo-ya-no-se-atreven-a-decirlo-en-publico.html