“Criticizing the policy of a State is a fundamental right and cannot constitute an apology for terrorism” | EUROtoday

VSSome will welcome it, whereas sighing quietly, “finally”. Others maybe can be sorry. But all men and women of fine will will assume just one factor: possibly the massacres will cease, possibly humanity may lastly prevail in all this infinite horror.

Because the column of the King of Jordan, Abdallah II, the President of the Egyptian Republic, Abdel Fattah Al-Sissi, and the President of the French Republic, Emmanuel Macron, revealed in The world on April 8, places worldwide legislation on the coronary heart of the Israeli-Palestinian query, by reaffirming respect for all lives and condemning all violations of worldwide humanitarian legislation, which have marked, since October 7, 2023, the massacres that every one have identified and nonetheless know. And they recall that their demand for a direct ceasefire in Gaza is predicated on United Nations (UN) Security Council Resolutions 2720 and 2728, which demand exactly this from all events.

The proclamation by these three heads of state of the important respect for worldwide humanitarian legislation is accompanied by all the pieces that has been overpassed for many years on this torn area: “We urge an end to all unilateral measures, including settlement activities and land confiscation. We also urge Israel to prevent settler violence. We emphasize the need to respect the historical and legal status quo of Muslim and Christian holy sites in Jerusalem (…). »

Finally, by advocating the two-state solution in accordance with international law and the relevant UN Security Council resolutions, the three heads of state definitively anchor international law as the only remedy for hatred and the only solution for peace. .

Essential base

But then, what happens to all these writings, press releases, leaflets which serve as the basis for all the procedures carried out by the prosecution for “apology of terrorism”? And who typically clumsily, or vehemently, however at all times with official emotion, have additionally solely referred to violations of worldwide legislation, a proper that France specifically has affirmed and supported for a number of many years inside the confines of the UN?

Should freedom of expression, even when extreme or provocative, be undermined by means of these procedures? Even although the European Court of Human Rights, our authorized and judicial compass in Europe, has at all times ranked this freedom among the many important foundations of a democratic society, recalling, in a call of June 11, 2020, that “Freedom of expression constitutes one of the essential foundations of a democratic society and one of the essential conditions for its progress and the development of each person. It applies not only to information or ideas that are favorably received or considered harmless or indifferent, but also to those that offend, shock or worry. This is what pluralism, tolerance and the spirit of openness require, without which there is no democratic society.”.

You have 49.57% of this text left to learn. The relaxation is reserved for subscribers.