“Plain text”: Then Robert Habeck and Alice Weidel guarantee themselves that they don’t have anything to say | EUROtoday

In any case, the intention of this system is an effective one. Not the 2 moderators, ZDF editor-in-chief Bettina Schauten and at present’s journal moderator Christian Sievers, ought to ask the 4 chancellor candidates this Thursday night, however the viewers. 120 residents from totally different areas of Germany who gathered in a Berlin TV studio. Part of it merely registered by electronic mail that different spectators had been invited by the accountable editorial group or, in response to a ZDF spokesman, “by institutions, associations or organizations” had been really helpful.

A not fully clear process, on the results of which Alice Weidel, the AfD candidate, ought to rub itself as anticipated in the middle of the cargo. First of all, the whole lot seems fairly combined. Some entrepreneurs sit within the viewers, staff, a works council has their say, a housewife, a pupil, a warehouse clerk. The non-party mayor of Emden additionally sits within the studio, however doesn’t have any say as little as a drag queen that has combined among the many individuals and is at all times put into the image by the cameras.

Olaf Scholz and ethical complicity

Then the primary of the 4 candidates for Chancellor is available in: Olaf Scholz from the SPD. Dark blue swimsuit, white shirt, darkish blue tie. Customized, not completely satisfied, in spite of everything, the state of affairs isn’t that. Like the next three candidates, the Chancellor has an excellent thirty minutes to reply the viewers points supposed for him. The format, a type of citizen query hour, is definitely Scholz. He accomplished greater than a dozen of it throughout his time period. Nevertheless, it will not get an excellent begin for him.

A housewife from Solingen, the town that had turn out to be a terrorist crime scene final summer season, instructed the Chancellor on the day of Munich: “We are afraid. Fear that this will continue. I am very worried about my grandchildren, my children, for my family, for my friends. “Your question is therefore:” If you don’t change something, do not wear a moral complicity on every single murder that has taken place so far has?”

Scholz reacts, without thinking long, routinely, almost too professional: “Allow me to tell me that this is a terrible attack after everything we know today what has taken place in Munich. Each of these acts is unbearable. It leaves many people who have lost their relatives. She leaves injured and killed. That has to and should deal with all of us … “And so on. Scholz refers to already changed laws and those that still have to be changed. And he refers to the need for deportations of criminals. Olaf Scholz does not enter into the question of the moral complicity that the Solingian asked.

The Chancellor is then confronted with the lost trust of citizens into politics as a whole, with the traffic light chaos, the shortage of housing, climate change and the crisis of the automotive industry. A decent ride through the community, through the crises of the past three years, which Olaf Scholz, lasts completely with himself, says: “I did something really important and that is to control Germany through the greatest post -war crisis that we have ever had . This is a manager that you cannot have higher. “

Robert Habeck and the frustration of the voters

It is a nice director of this “plain text” present that the redeeming candidates for chancellor meet briefly within the studio. Olaf Scholz and Robert Habeck, for instance, make good effort collectively. The Chancellor may even be carried away by the dedication “We also like ourselves”. Then Habeck-dark grey swimsuit, white shirt, open collar-stands to the ZDF viewers. In this case, the query of a talented employee from Magdeburg, which describes the failed site visitors mild coalition as a “pipe crepe”, which has damaged a lot of its guarantees. His query to Habeck: “How do you want to convince voters to go to go at all?”

As typical, the Minister of Economy reaches deep into the field with the massive political-philosophical normal locations: “If people withdraw, then it is over with Germany.” It is a mistake to imagine that democracy can merely be left to politicians . “Democracy is not a viewer. It is only possible when people are involved in the elections. ”He subsequently hoped that this night alone will convey this program again to the questioner“ a bit of curiosity, that would not be bad. And maybe then a little commitment. “

Habeck recommends reading the party programs to the frustrated this time and no voter, which were very different. And he advises to understand the compromise as something good again. Not as a resolution, as the wrong way or even as a break. “What we need is the well -understood understanding that in the end the condition is the condition that we can also have different opinions. Otherwise Germany will fly apart. “

Habeck’s message has not arrived at the skilled worker. “Again because of that,” says the man from Magdeburg, “very clearly: What should I choose? Need or misery? I don’t have anything else. ”Afterwards, Habeck nonetheless has to cope with the medium-sized disaster, electromobility (additionally within the disaster), crime and inexperienced peace coverage. No profitable subject. The inexperienced candidate for chancellor can not actually rating that night. Then Alice Weidel comes.

Alice Weidel and the welcome tradition

The two candidates for Chancellor briefly guarantee one another within the TV studio that they don’t have anything to say. Then Habeck, and Weidel – denims, jacket, turtleneck sweater, pocket fabric – may give a press release on the assault of Munich. “I can inform you that with an AfD authorities, the person wouldn’t have come into the nation in any respect and he wasn’t right here for a very long time.” People have their noses full, says Weidel. “You want to have solutions. You want secure limits. They want to have a consistent enforcement of law and law, i.e. the deportation of illegal as well as from criminals. And that’s why the man had actually lost nothing here. “

Moderator Sievers’ note that the perpetrator has not yet been punished and also not subject to departure is no longer debated. Instead, a medical technology entrepreneur from Potsdam complains that more and more employees with a migration background were “no longer wanted” in his company. His question is therefore what Weidel wanted to do to ensure that these employees felt welcome in Germany.

The AfD boss asks how many employees do something in this company and concludes from the answer (“medical implants, very special high-tech products”) that the Potsdam entrepreneur has “extremely clever employees”. He could therefore say the following: “You have nothing to fear at all.” The AfD is only concerned with preventing illegal migration. “I just want this country to be very, very attractive for people who work in your company.” A plea in which moderator Sievers discovered “a kind of welcome culture”. “But not for illegal,” Weidel adds a little frightened.

In her view, she then briefly commented on the not sufficiently neutral audience, which some of them acknowledged with laughter instead of applause. And Weidel gets together with the owner of a large elderly care company from Bielefeld, who accuses the AfD a completely failed approach in migration policy. Germany needs “more migration, nothing less – and that has nothing to do with remigration for which they stand”. The German geriatric care companies alone would need 130,000 additional employees by the end of the next legislature. Weidel then accuses the entrepreneur not to know the AfD program and what he just said “learned by heart”. Qualified immigrants in the German labor market are welcome to their party. “And then they still have to pay people properly, then they have no shortage of skilled workers.”

Once on the road, the Chancellor candidate briefly cleaned the managing director of a Schleswig-Holstein citizens’ wind farm. Friedrich Merz, on the other hand, is greeted almost warmly. Her hand to work with the Union remains stretched out, says Weidel. “We are always ready for reasonable politics that the CDU can only implement with the AfD, not with the Greens.”

Friedrich Merz and the fire behind Brandwall

The CDU Chancellor candidate, the last respondent on this long television evening, thankfully rejects the friendly offer. “Ms. Weidel, we are as far apart with no other party.” The Union, says Friedrich Merz, therefore made a coalition decision before the election. “Not with them.” A verdict that at least goes too far to the department head of a Hessian construction company. He advocates that the Union of the AfD should not fundamentally refuse to talk. The first question to Friedrich Merz is therefore: “Why does the CDU strictly hold onto the fire wall – despite so many agreement?”

Even the Union Chancellor candidate-blue suit, white shirt, blue-red tie-does not answer directly, but first explains why he personally does not use the term “fire wall”. “Because I think we have to fight the fire behind the wall. And should not contribute to the fact that it becomes a surface fire. ”In this context, Merz refers to Austria, the place the cooperation between the opposite events with the correct FPÖ has solely strengthened it after which asks:“ We actually wish to work with a celebration in Germany, We Christian Democrats, who’s open proper -wing extremist, who’s open to foreigners who’re brazenly speaking about these matters as we hear from this celebration? Do we actually need that? “

No, Merz finally answers himself and then considers a passionate plea for the ability of the parties to act in the democratic center. You would have to solve the problems of this country – migration and economic policy. “I have the confidence that we succeed. I don’t want to go with them! ”At least this topic is also cleared for the time after the election. On the other hand, as is the case with the debt brake, with the renovation backlog of the German infrastructures, with the building energy network, the heat pumps and the future defense budget-this also largely leaves the favorite among the four candidates for chancellor.

Next Sunday Scholz, Merz, Weidel and Habeck will meet directly. RTL transfers the “Quadrell” from 20.15. Three days later, on Wednesday at 8:15 p.m., Chancellor Olaf Scholz and opposition chief Friedrich Merz will meet for the ultimate TV duel at Welt TV.