Can Meta lose Instagram and WhatsApp? The trial that worries Zuckerberg | EUROtoday

The grievance was filed 5 years in the past by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the competitors gendarme within the United States. She notably accuses Meta, ex-Facebook, of getting purchased WhatsApp and Instagram to torpedo her opponents. The American multinational has till July 3 to counter these allegations. In 2012, the agency spent a billion {dollars} for the acquisition of Instagram after which, two years later, $ 19 billion for that of WhatsApp. Today, the Meta group welcomes some 3.3 billion customers daily to its varied platforms.

Several antitrust trials in progress within the United States

To uncover



The kangaroo of the day

While the FTC will most likely attempt to show that Meta’s monopoly has created degraded use for its customers, the Mark Zuckerberg group will strive, for its half, to show that its investments have made these start-ups superproductions. Meta is, furthermore, not the one firm within the viewfinder of the FTC. In addition to the group based by Mark Zuckerberg, Apple, Amazon and Google additionally face authorized procedures. The latter was additionally discovered responsible of abuse of dominant place on the net analysis market in August.

Read too Masculinity, freedom of expression: why Mark Zuckerberg Vire TrumpistAnd this trial is all of the extra emblematic since it’s a part of a really specific context, that of the republican flip of the massive names of American tech, within the type of rallying of the giants of the Sillicon Valley to Donald Trump. A turning level regarding the patron of Meta, the second world fortune based on Forbes : Following the observe opened by Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, in early 2024, turned on his coverage of verification and moderation of the content material broadcast on his social networks-in addition to attempting to draw the favors of the White House, by appointing Republicans to vital positions in his group.

In January, the tech boss put an finish to the fact-checking offered by sure media on Facebook and Instagram. Instead, he established “community notes” presupposed to deliver context to disputed publications-annotations written by Internet customers themselves. Another side of this flip: the relief of moderation insurance policies, specifically on delicate topics equivalent to immigration or gender id. An all of the extra hanging reversal he argued, a couple of months earlier, for a strengthening of the struggle towards disinformation, deemed poisonous for his platforms.