Block course of: “Children have other names in school. We exchanged cell phones, only pay with cash” | EUROtoday

If issues get darkish and chilly now, Klara, 14, and Theo Hensel, 12, don’t go exterior. As her father tells, the siblings then see black -clad people who find themselves packed in scarves and put on hats – and that reminds them of the masked males, whom they grabbed, captivated and dragged to Germany on New Year’s Eve 2023/2024.

“They have nightmares, cannot sleep when the door was closed and are afraid that something like this would happen again,” mentioned her father Stephan Hensel on Monday. He takes half within the process, which is especially in opposition to his ex-wife Christina Block as a suspected shopper of the kidnapping, as a co-plaintiff.

In Hall 237 of the regional courtroom – a room significantly secured with a metal door, through which procedures are in any other case carried out in opposition to significantly harmful criminals – the daddy provides an perception right into a household life that’s formed by “fear”. “The children have other names at school. We exchanged the cell phones, we have no social media profiles, only pay cash so as not to be persecuting,” says Hensel. They solely visited a health care provider in neighboring locations. It is just not identified the place precisely you reside in Denmark. A life like in a witness safety program.

What might sound exaggerated naturally has its background within the youngsters in query. They have lived with their father since August 2021 and didn’t need to return to their mom who accused her of being violent. Hensel then determined to not hand over the mom to the mom in accordance with her request, though she obtained a corresponding resolution on the Higher Regional Court in Hamburg three months later. However, as a result of this courtroom resolution was not enforceable because of the Danish jurisdiction, the mom was proper – and but there was empty palms. According to the general public prosecutor’s workplace, she is alleged to have been lively.

Christina Block denies each participation within the command firm that Israeli staff carried out by a safety firm. A couple of days after the kidnapping, the identical increased regional courtroom spoke to the daddy sole custody.

On this negotiation day it ought to now be about whether or not the kidnapping had penalties for the kids. Hensel solutions the questions of decide Isabel Hildebrandt, reviews on camouflaged life in Denmark. Then block defender Ingo Bott can ask questions-and it rapidly turns into clear the place the journey ought to go.

Because Bott tries to query the credibility of the witness. He inquires about points from the custody process, the acts of which is meant to fill 1000’s of pages, desires to know what function the household chocolate consumption had performed at Hensel.

What precisely he desires to search out out or show with it stays unclear, as a result of decide Hildebrandt instantly stops the authorized journey to the sweets shelf of the alternative facet: “We do not work on a family court procedure here, please do not let it out, but only ask about the accusable procedure,” she describes Bott.

It has to seize after each tip, that is his job. He has to emphasise Hensel because the offspring, manipulative father who’s suspending his youngsters in opposition to the mom as a result of the hatred of the ex-wife has him underneath management. He asks for a so-called enamel plaster sport, through which the kids mutually mentioned concerning the mom when brushing your enamel within the night. If nothing may have occurred, the sport misplaced. The father says that he is aware of nothing about that.

Hensel needs to be the one who acquired the unlucky occasions – which after all not answerable for his shopper – within the presentation of the protection as a result of he took the kids hostage.

“I don’t let myself be shown here,” says the daddy

And then again, the opposite facet of the plate runs. There it’s the mom who takes cash and energy collectively and acquired a kidnapped border from former secret service brokers who assist her proper, whatever the youngsters.

In this modesty desert, through which everybody thinks that the true being on the opposite facet of the corridor, particulars from the custody course of come to sunlight, which make clear your complete disappointment of the case.

Who has reported which allegations of violence reported, communicated. What precisely did the kids say? When was that? Before New Year’s Eve or after? This is the way it goes in a single: the try to show that Hensel doesn’t say the reality.

And it in flip reviews, like the kids, uncommon, particularly “stinking and with greasy hair in the old clothes”, from a weekend in Hamburg to him to Denmark – the mom was handled with the 2 as negligible. Who desires to verify that? And who use it?

“I don’t let myself be shown here,” says the daddy on the finish of the trial day. “The youth welfare office did not help. The public prosecutor did not help. That’s why Klara wants to testify so that someone finally listens to her.”

There continues to be no fastened date for his daughter’s interrogation. Will she say one thing that’s the “truth”?

Chief Reporter Per Hinrichs writes about crime, judiciary and different social points.